Hi There
Tags: 2006, baby Permalink Comments (2)

For a few years, our favorite dinner-leftovers-for-lunch meal has been bun, the tasty Vietnamese noodle dish with fresh vegetables and herbs, cellophane noodles, and grilled shrimp or chicken. It’s fresh tasting, flavorful, spicy, tangy, a little sweet, and lots of of great textures. We’ve made it probably a hundred times, and we never get sick of it. Sometimes, though, you need to change things up a bit. Using the same idea, same part of the world, but changing the country of origin, we’ve come up with a new favorite. Soba.
Soba are the Japanese buckwheat noodles, usually served cold with some sort of sesame dressing. Like bun, the majority of the dish is cold, with most of the prep work being chopping and mixing of the dressing. Not really happy with most of the recipes that I found online, I made up my own hybrid version. It starts with the noodles of course, about 2/3 lb. for four servings. Boiled until just tender and then shocked under cold water to stop the cooking. They’re dressed with a dressing made from 2 parts soy sauce, 1 part rice wine vinegar, 1 part sesame oil, and a little sugar, and a good handful of thinly sliced scallions. The vegetables in this dish are thinly julienned carrots and finely chopped Japanese cucumber, both pickled quickly in rice wine vinegar, sugar, and a little salt. They add a nice crunch and tanginess to the bowl. Keeping things on the light side, some lightly pan-fried tofu, cooked until just a little crispy and finished with some soy sauce, tops things off. A drizzle of chili sauce and a final sprinkling of toasted sesame seeds are there solely to get stuck in your teeth.
It’s a simple and quick recipe, but it packs some serious flavors and textures. You can tailor is to your own tastes, using whatever sort of vegetables or protein that you want. I think we’ll stick with this version for a while, or until we get sick of it and have to move on to another country.
Tags: 2006, cooking, food, japanese, noodles, soba, tofu Permalink Comments (1)

What’s better than a holiday that is purely about eating. Sure, there’s the whole family thing and giving thanks and football and all of that junk, but all anyone really cares about is the food. More specifically, the sides and gravy. Does anyone ever really get excited about the turkey? Is there such a thing as a really fantastic bird or are you just satisfied that it’s not overcooked and dry (this does not include deep fried turkeys, which, I’m told, are fantastic)? In reality, the turkey is just a vehicle for the gravy. Personally. my favorite thing is the stuffing. Really, do you ever have stuffing any other time than on Thanksgiving? Mashed potatoes? You have those all the time. Roasted vegetables? Ditto. Green bean casserole? Well, I really don’t ever need that. Desserts? Well, pumpkin pie and apple pie just don’t really get me too excited. Stuffing is where it’s at. I hope I get to cook Thanksgiving at some point, because despite enjoying a really basic stuffing, I’d love to try one made with cornbread and sausage or bacon, or with some chestnuts and sage, or any of the variations that I’ve seen over the years, but never tasted. The people who cook Thanksgiving year in and year out consistently make the same dishes year after year without any variations, and it’s hard to blame them. People expect certain things every year, and god forbid you change your mashed potato recipe! Unless asked, I just stay out of the kitchen and let them do their thing. I’ll get my chance eventually. Happy stuffing day!
Tags: 2006, food, thanksgiving Permalink Comments
Most of you know that I spend an inordinate amount of time in the kitchen, but it’s rare to ever find me doing any sort of baking. It’s said that there are two types of people: bakers and cooks. I am most certainly the latter, and I can figure out something to do with whatever’s in the fridge and a well-stocked pantry. Give me a bowl of flour, a dozen eggs, some baking powder and butter, and I’m completely lost. Sure, anyone can follow a recipe for cookies or a cake, but for me, it’s not fun at all. Ok, mix the dry ingredients, then beat some eggs with sugar, then add the eggs one at a time, then slowly add the dry ingredients. There’s no sounds, no smells, no feedback whatsoever. It’s just following directions without any real understanding of why you’re doing what you’re doing, why things are done in a certain order, or exactly why sometimes I need baking powder and sometimes backing soda. Sure, I like the final results (sometimes), but the process just isn’t that enjoyable. There’s an exact science to it all, and frankly, I get enough science at work.
Bread is pretty much just as baffling to me. All of the business with yeast and starters and fermentation and gluten and proofing and punching down and proofing again and all of that. It’s such a science, although less precise than dessert baking. Besides playing with my parents’ little used bread machine (remember when everyone was buying bread machines back in the 80’s?) I’ve never attempted to bake bread at home. I suppose I’m a bit of a bread snob, and being able to buy some unbelievable artisanal breads nearby always left me thinking that any home attempts, without the commercial steam-injected ovens that are often necessary, was sort of pointless. Yes, I know I’ve spent years working on my pizza dough, but despite my recent happiness with it, I don’t think that I’ll ever really be satisfied until I’m using a wood fired pizza oven.
Then, along came Jim Lahey’s No-Knead Bread Recipe and everything changed. Blogger and bakers all of the land hauled out their Le Creuset’s and got mixing. And waiting. And more waiting. And then finally baking. The recipe requires almost no effort, and as the article states, a four year old could master it. The ingredients (flour, water, salt, yeast) are mixed in a bowl until they come together (about a minute), you cover it with plastic wrap, and then wait. For 18 hours. After a quick shaping and another two hour rise, you dump the loaf into a enameled cast iron pot that’s been heating up in a 450 degree oven and let it bake, covered for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, you take off the lid to let it bake for another 30 minutes and get nice and browned and crusty. That’s it. Ok, so it takes a little advanced planning, but it literally takes about 3 minutes of actual effort to make this.

So how did it come out? Outstanding. Beautiful crust, springy well-formed holes in the crumb, great flavor from the long fermentation. What more could you ask for? We took a chance on the first loaf and added a handful of Kalamata olives to the dough after the initial 18 hour rise. Despite a less than stellar distribution of the olives, it worked out nicely.
So what to do with a perfectly baked loaf of olive bread? Eat it, of course. A slice of it with some Amish butter that I just discovered was pretty much the perfect way to appreciate it, but we weren’t about to stop there. For dinner? Panini, of course. The first with tomato, basil and fresh mozzarella, and the second with prosciutto, arugula, and mozzarella. They were, of course, terrible. Just kidding. Will we be making this again? Hell yes. All of you people who are afraid of carbs, get over it. Bread is good. Bread is great. Now go bake some of your own.
Tags: 2006, baking, bread, food, noknead, olives, panini Permalink Comments

A few random thoughts and observations:
Arriving a full 45 minutes before the start of the screening for fast Food Nation, we were faced with a line already a couple hundred people long. Seriously, I know movies are expensive, but how early did these people have to get there to be first in line? Needless to say, we didn’t get in, just missing by, oh, 60 people.
On the bright side, we did make a visit to UBurger in Kenmore Square. I think this place is going to do very well. A pretty simple menu of burgers, fries, onion rings, some chicken sandwiches, hot dogs, salads, and frappes. Everything is made to order, everything is made fresh, the beef is ground on site daily, the fries are hand-cut, the room is sleek and clean. A similar philosophy to In-N-Out, the burgers are pretty damn tasty. Simple bun, medium thickness burger, shredded lettuce, tomato, onion, pickles, and house spread. The fries are straight out of the fryer, and could use a little salt and a little extra time draining the oil. More expensive than a fast food joint, paying about $12 for two cheeseburgers, an order of fries, and a frappe, but well worth it. If it was in a more convenient location (we scored a metered parking spot right in front!), i have a feeling we’d make regular visits. Once Red Sox season hits, this place is going to be slammed. I know I rail against fast food, but this is in a different category. It’s good quality food that just happens to be fast. I can feel good about eating it (although my belly wasn’t exactly happy and I had a slightly greasy feeling afterwards, but that’s probably more due to how infrequently I eat this sort of stuff).
Tags: 2006, topten Permalink Comments (1)
In a world of truffle oil, candied fennel, and foie gras, sometimes, you just need Mama’s spaghetti and meatballs. It’s a simple dish that warms you up on a cold rainy night, and in honor of George losing his own meatballs today, we’ll name them after him.
I make them just like my Italian grandma taught me. In this case, we’re using ground dark turkey meat, which has more fat in it that the white meat, and of course, more flavor and moisture. The recipe is a bit inexact, as it takes some adjustment to get it right. We start with one pound of meat (feel free to substitute beef, veal, pork, or ideally, a combo of all three), add one beaten egg (freshly pooped that morning!), a handful of Italian breadcrumbs, a handful of grated parm or pecorino, some chopped parsley, salt, and pepper. Mix it all up, and see how we do. You don’t want it to be too wet or too dry, but just holding together. If you add too many breadcrumbs, your meatballs will come out stiff and dry. Too few, and they won’t hold together. Err on the side of too few, and gradually add more to get it to the right consistency.
Once you get it right, it’s time to check it for flavor. Obviously, you won’t want to eat raw meat, turkey or otherwise, so get a non-stick pan, take a small spoonful of the mixture, and quickly cook it. If it needs anything, now’s the time to add it. If you’re happy with it, it’s time for some cooking.
Some people prefer to just form the meatballs and plop them into to simmering tomato sauce to cook them through, which will work just fine. My Italian grandma taught me to brown them first, then finish them off in the sauce. To form them, it’s best to wet your hands, pick up some of the mixture, and gently form it in to a ball. The gentler you are with your balls, the more tender they’ll come out. In that non-stick pan over medium-high heat, add a glug of olive oil and start browning your balls on all sides (really, I can’t say balls enough). It will only take a couple of minutes to get them nicely browned, and then transfer them to a saucepan with some gently simmering sauce. They’ll take another 10 minutes or so to cook through, and you’re pretty much done.
We tend to use lots of fancy sounding pasta shapes; perciatelli, bucatini, casarecce, orichietti, etc. This meal calls for good old spaghetti, tossed with the sauce, more freshly chopped parsley, grated parm, and topped with the meatballs and more parm. And it must be tossed. A plate of plain, unadorned spaghetti topped with sauce and meatballs just leaves the majority of it, well, plain. The sauce never gets incorporated into the pasta, and the spaghetti eventually just sticks into one giant clump. That’s no good. Enjoy your balls because George can’t. Mangia!
Tags: 2006, cooking, food, meatballs, pasta Permalink Comments
You’ll have to excuse us if we’re feeling a little bit groggy today. For the past two nights, George has kindly woken us up at 3:15AM and 3:30AM (with a follow up at 4:45 this morning) with his really annoying and consistent crying to tell us that he has to go out. Sure, I’m glad that he’s telling us that he has to go out, but couldn’t he just go back to sleep and wait for a more appropriate hour? He does this about once every other week, and it’s to be expected for a puppy. Hey, maybe the whole daylight savings thing has thrown him off? Well, maybe it’s a coincidence, but George also turned 6 months old two days ago. Apparently, this is the equivalent of being a teenager, when his hormones start to go wacky, he starts going wacky, he starts running around like a crazy man chewing up everything in sight, and ignoring his house breaking whenever he feels like it. Fun! It’s not a coincidence that a large percentage of dogs that are given up for adoption are given up around this age. They can be a huge pain in the ass and not so much fun to deal with. George has lived a pretty good life so far, but his world is about to be flipped upside down.
Coinciding with his growing hormones and his 6 months of living, we’re chopping his nuts off. Yes, it’s neutering time. I get the feeling that he won’t be doing so much humping of his stuffed toys for a little while. Hopefully, in short time, he’ll be back to the cute little pup that he’s always been…
Now how can you get angry at a face like that?
Photo via Flickr and wonmyeong.
As I sit here diligently making my way through leftover Halloween candy, I realize that I have very distinct likes and dislikes when it comes to candy. I have an immense sweet tooth, one that I’ve inherited from my dad, but it’s only for specific sorts of treats.
Of course, when it comes to buying Halloween candy for the kiddies, I’m really buying it for me, hoping for few trick or treaters and lots of leftovers for me. I rarely ever buy candy. In fact, with the exception of the occasional emergency rest stop bag of peanut M&M’s and packages of Jelly Bellys for my office, I never buy candy. It just never occurs to me, and frankly, doesn’t really appeal to me. I would never think of eating a whole candy bar, and sort of makes me sick thinking about it.
I need my candy to come in small doses, be simple in nature, usually contain chocolate, and contain something crispy or crunchy. Candies falling into this category include M&M’s (preferably peanut or the irresistibly addictive crispy ones, plain if there’s nothing else around, but never the peanut butter ones), mini Nestle Crunches, mini KitKats, and the latest addition, Whoppers. Minty treats also are good, such as Junior Mints (“Who’s gonna turn down a Junior Mint? It’s chocolate, it’s peppermint– it’s *delicious*!”) and York Peppermint Patties. Anything too peanutty or peanut buttery is a no go, as is anything caramel-y or nougat-y. That means no Snickers bars or 3 Musketeers or anything like that.
I like candies with a structure that I can deconstruct in my mouth. I’ll never take a bite of a KitKat, but I’ll chew off the various strata of crispiness until I get to the bottom. I’ll break off the outer candy shell of a peanut M&M and wait for the chocolate to dissolve before eating the peanut. I’ll take a bite of a Nestle Crunch but let the chocolate dissolve until I’m left with only the crispy rice. This is completely mental of course, and I’m sure a psychologist would have a field day with my candy eating methods. I’m showing self-restraint and trying to make the treat last as long as possible. It’s the same reason it takes me five hours to finish a Clif Bar. But everyone has their own methods and likes and dislikes, right? If you really want to read about some wacky candy behavior, check out Steve Almond’s Candyfreak, a hilarious account of the authors candy-filled childhood, and his adult cross-country search to track down the sources of some regional old time favorites. A great read. In the meantime, enjoy your Halloween leftovers. And save me some peanut M&M’s please.